t had to happen. The science boys had their
Scientific Victorian and it was only a matter of time
before calls for a similar arts publication grew shriller. The
number of post-certificate arts students in 1953 when the science
journal first appeared was minuscule – perhaps a few handfuls
who stayed only five terms before leaving in September for the
University. But by 1957 a critical mass of arts students drawn from
the V.I. and from other K.L., Seremban and Klang schools was finally
in place. It was the heady era of growth and innovation under headmaster
and geographer Dr G E D Lewis who gave his blessings to any student
initiative for extra-curricular activities provided an advisory teacher
could be coaxed to act as figurehead. The boys and girls would do the
rest.
The May 1957 issue of the Seladang editorial
announced the imminent debut of “the V.I. Economics Review” to
be published by the V.I. Sixth Formers. In the same breath it wondered
aloud as to the viability of yet another school publication, what with
the limited number of advertisers in Kuala Lumpur town. No doubt some
were staunch V.I. supporters, and, indeed, were Old Boys themselves, it
allowed, but, surely, might not there be a limit to their benevolence?
And besides might not the subscribers, the V.I. boys and girls, be a
little overburdened financially, having to support FOUR school publications?
Enter Hamzah bin Majeed, the Mock Elections
landslide winner of 1956, playwright of that wicked Merdeka
parody of the same year and erstwhile gadfly of the establishment.
Replying to the Seladang, he explained that there had also been
proposals to publish a V.I. Historical Review and a V.I. Literary
Review. It made sense to combine all such endeavours into a single
arts journal - not just the Economics Review - which would have
articles on English, Malay, history, geography and economics. The
cost of the new journal, he promised, would be kept as low as possible.
Hamzah was, of course, a shoo-in for editor of
the new paper on the block. He was a third generation Victorian to
boot, his grandfather having attended the old V.I. on the banks of
the Klang River. Active in debating and drama, Hamzah played Nerissa,
a servant to Portia in the 1952 Merchant of Venice, in the post-war
resurrection of the V.I. drama movement. In 1953 he had edited the 7C
Youth Herald, a cyclostyled collection of articles and jokes which
made a modest profit in sales around the school. By the end of 1954
he was already promoted the Seladang joint Feature Editor
with Quan Siew Khin.
There had been discussions at the end of 1956
between arts students and teachers, Mr A. Milne and Dr. Kathleen
Jones, following suggestions by Dr Lewis for a arts journal. It was
decided that this new journal would be radically different from the
Scientific Victorian in both concept and format. The latter -
the official mouthpiece of the Science and Maths Society - was a collection
of general articles on science, tailored for public consumption and
heavy on the "wow" aspects of science - quizzes, quick facts, puzzles,
give-aways. Their arts journal, free of affiliation to any school club
or society by contrast, would be a serious collection of “think pieces”,
researched, crafted and classified by departments – English, Malay, History
and so on. It would be targeted at the upper secondary arts readership,
in the V.I. and other schools. Coined by one of the teachers, the name of
this august publication, would be Analekta – a Greek word meaning
“writings or ideas gathered together”. A school-wide competition for best
cover design was won by fifth former Yahya Nordin. It was a simple design
and consisted of a beige-coloured cover with stripes running down the left.
(The covers of later issues would have a signature light blue colour instead.)
The enthusiasm for the Analekta was contagious.
Never mind that Hamzah's "editorial office" was just two tables cobbled
together in one of the arts classrooms of the new Sixth Form block. His
classmates - essentially his Merdeka cast - rallied round to help.
As the last scaffolding was taken down in the Merdeka Stadium next door,
in Hamzah's makeshift office, the last Analekta proofs were
hurriedly corrected and printer's dummies snipped and pasted in place
for the new publication. The new V.I. baby come into the world just weeks
before another baby, an independent Malaya, was proclaimed a mere hundred
yards away.
Perhaps caution was the watchword for this inaugural
issue for Hamzah was nominally "joint editor" with Dr Jones. There were
no student editors for the various departments, only teachers: Messrs Bennett
(English), Jaffar Menantu (Malay), Lam Kok Hon (Geography), John Doraisamy
(Economics and Government) and Dr Jogindra Singh (History) but copy came entirely
from the student body. Only two students served officially on the editorial board –
Amarjit Singh Verick as Business Manager and Krishen Jit as Editorial
Assistant.
Hamzah's editorial declared that the main responsibilities
of a good educational institution was to provide an all-round education –
to produce citizens with a balanced outlook, not “just people with a
scientific limp or the gawkish affectations of pseudo-sophistications.”
Plain literacy if devoid of originality and imagination, he contended,
was not enough either. The country was a meeting place for any ideas and
cultures and should produce intellectuals of calibre. What education owed
Malaya, Hamzah insisted, was an identity. The spirit of enquiry and ideas lent
excitement to study and research and led to a broader outlook. "... The
Analekta was the V.I.’s contribution to that process."
1,500 copies were printed and sold to pupils of the
upper forms. Copies were peddled in other Kuala Lumpur schools while many
more schools elsewhere, from Penang Free School to Raffles Institution
in Singapore received a complimentary copy each. Even the University
of Malaya library in Singapore was sent a copy which today is guarded
like gold in the rare books section! Four pages of ads – including a full
page taken out by Hamzah’s family business, C. L. A. Majeed, and a half
page by Krishen Jit’s family textile business, Dyalchand Amarsingh - helped
defray the printing costs.
Between the covers it was as if the literary flood
gates had opened to release a torrent of pent-up talent. Eight think
pieces packed the English Section including a poem by Hamzah and a
short story - the first of many more to come in his writing career -
by M. Shamughalingam, the Seladang editor who had initially voiced
doubts over the viability of the publication. They jostled with an
overview of poetical themes by Zahariah bte Mohd Hashim and a discussion of
Jane Austen’s characters by Indira Pillay. Future drama producer and critic,
Krishen Jit discussed the Indian epic poem, The Mahabharata, while
future radio producer and TV sitcom star, Tan Jin Chor, explored the question,
Why study English Literature?
The literary offerings of the Malay Section comprised
three poems including one, Aku bukan boneka, by Form Five science
student Khalid Musbah, while Ariffin Mohd Yassin penned a survey, Persuratan
Melayu sa-pintas lalu. The Geography Section included a survey of squatters
in Kuala Lumpur by Isher Singh Sekhon. It was an eye-opener to read that
a quarter of Kuala Lumpur's 400,000 people were squatters. In a three-and-a-half
page analysis, Isher Singh examined the reasons for people flocking to Kuala
Lumpur and the problems arising therein. Maureen Siebel's topic was The
Klang River, an innovative look at a familiar river. With a geographer’s
eye, she followed the Klang River from source to its mouth 90 miles away.
The river, bane of the old V.I. in High Street
because of floods, had actually been diverted three times in total, Maureen's
research revealed. The first time was in 1884, then again in 1888. Finally,
between 1926 and 1934, the many kinks of the river below the High Street
police station were straightened.
The History Section started off with a Phang Kon Hee
piece asking Has history a meaning?, a profound work by a schoolboy
that could easily have been passed off as a university term paper. Amarjit
Singh Verick examined Communism in Malaya in a piece of topical
interest given that the communist insurgency was officially still
on-going. A companion article by Sieh Kok Ying examined the resettlement
and problems of rural squatters brought about by that same insurgency.
Both writers touched on sensitive issues that the public media of that
day would not have addressed. Still other pieces covered piracy in Malayan
waters, the Dowager Empress of China and the role of arts and crafts in
Malayan history.
In the Economics and Government Section, future
University of Malaya history lecturer Rollins Bonney discussed the
question, Is the United Nations necessary?, an insightful look at
global political machinations of the day. Delving into the aims of the
U.N. Charter, Rollins critically examined them against the issues of the
day - Algeria, Hungary and Cyprus. Phang Kon Hee, now wearing an economist’s
hat, returned to argue for the establishment of a central bank in newly
independent Malaya. He obviously ate what he baked as, after
graduation from university, he joined Bank Negara as a senior economist!
Hamzah Majeed and Maureen Siebel turned up here too to discuss, respectively,
Malaya’s new Parliament and Automation and Modern Society.
At the end of the day, the Analekta had earned
its wings and over the next several years its contributors would comprise
many outstanding Victorians destined to fill the halls of academia, corporate
board rooms and the corridors of political power. And what a roll call!
Future academics included history lecturer Krishen Jit, Hamzah's successor in 1958,
who wrote a well-researched piece for the Economics and Government section comparing
the powers of the British Prime Minister with that of the American President.
Foreshadowing his future as doyen of the Malaysian drama scene, Krishen Jit also
contributed Directions in Modern Drama to the English section. Goh Yoon
Fong, a future history professor and colleague of Krishen Jit, wrote on the
Manchus in China. The Hen Pecked Husband in the 1958 issue, by Leong Siew
Yue (later Siew-Yue Killingley), was most probably her first ever published story.
Changing tack, she examined Li Po: Poet of Nature the following year.
Not surprisingly, Siew-Yue went on to be a writer, poet and linguistics professor,
with a slew of poems, plays, short stories and learned papers to her name.
K P Kannan Kutty who wrote Nationalism and Colonialism
in South East Asia, Goh Joon Hai (Confucianism in Chinese history),
Cheong Kee Cheok (The character of the Indian Mutiny) all later became
academics at the University of Malaya. M. Pathmanathan's 1959 contribution, A
Note on the Constitution of Singapore the year the colony achieved self-government
foreshadowed his passionate interest for politics and government. Today Professor
Pathmanathan helms the Centre for Policy Studies. Wan Ahmad Hulaimi, fluently bilingual
in English and Malay, could just as effortlessly pen James Thurber: An
appreciation and God save the Queen’s English, as he could two Malay
poems, Pronounciamento and Choretan Hari Natal for the Analekta.
Hulaimi went on to read and lecture law with his V.I. senior, Rafiah Salim,
who herself contributed two Analekta pieces for the Malay section -
Meperkatakan sadikit tentang Sajak and the other Hamka – Pujangga
Romantis yang berdasarkan Islam. Rafiah is today Vice-Chancellor of
Universiti Malaya.
On an equally lofty perch on the other side of the causeway,
stands Tan Lee Meng, a judge of the Supreme Court of Singapore and former
Dean of the NUS Law Faculty and Deputy Vice-Chancellor. Displaying flashes
of his future legal skills, he penned the 1966 Commonwealth, whither art
thou?, a six-page examination of its role and purpose. Then, donning his
historian and political scientist's hat, Lee Meng wrote for the next
Analekta a critique of the Mainland China and
Taiwan standoff in The Chinese Republic. Voon Phin Keong’s 1961 piece on
World population and its problems seemed to presage his first vocation
as Professor of Geography at Universiti Malaya. Likewise, his other contribution,
in the History section of the same issue, on relations between China and 15th century
Malacca, foreshadowed his present position as director of the Centre for
Malaysian Chinese Studies. Pamela Sodhy, today a history professor at Georgetown
University in Washington D.C. was a non-contributing editor in 1964. A most
unusual article in the 1963 issue was entitled Conjuring (Magic) and Hypnotism
in a new catch-all General Section. It was written by Yee Thiam Fook who, after
his V.I. schooldays, converted his pastime into a life career. He is today a
professional magician residing in Italy with the stage name of Shaun Yee!
Another high profile personality was Mohamed Noordin Sopiee
(later Tan Sri), future chairman and CEO of the Institute of Strategic and
International Studies Malaysia. One would like to think that Noordin Sopiee first
honed his analytical skills in the V.I. with Analekta pieces like The
Communist Thesis: A Critique, Lloyd's Open Door and Some Obstacles
to industrialisation in under-developed countries. Many captains of industry,
too, made their writing debut in the journal, including Datuk Mizanur Rahman,
future Managing Director of the Chemical Corporation of Malaysia (A Survey
of Rubber) and N. Sadasivan, Director-General-to-be of MIDA (The Essential
Qualities of a Democracy) Then there's Shiew Wan Shing, future Group Managing
Director of UMW Holdings, who surveyed Cocoa in Malaya as well as Liu
Tai Fung, destined to helm the various Kerry companies of the Kuok Group in Hong
Kong, who edited the 1960 Analekta and contributed An appraisal of the
British Judicial System. Returning from the 1964 V.I. tour of India, R.
Thillainathan was moved to ask Why not a Ministry of Family Planning?
in the 1965 Economics section. A top scholar in his university days, he went
on to be firstly a professor of economics, then to helm several local banks,
before taking up his present stratospheric position as Genting Berhad's CFO.
His junior, Gan Wee Beng, followed a similar trajectory. Writing Marxian
Economics: a Critical Appraisal on his own and co-authoring with Cheong
Kwok Yew a 1967 case study of the rural economy of a fishing village in his
native Trengganu, he served as an academic before leaving for the corporate world
to be a senior economic advisor to the Monetary Authority of Singapore. Wee Beng
now sits in the commanding heights of the CIMB empire. M. Shanmughalingam (Datuk
today), penned a 1958 Analekta review of the economic progress in Malaya
a year after Merdeka, an ideal dry run for his future role as economic advisor
to the Minister of Finance. He runs his own consultation company Trilogic Sdn Bhd
today, whose corporate colours are light blue and dark blue!
As for our pioneering
editor, Hamzah Majeed (also Datuk today), he charted a glittering career in
government, serving as Director-General of three departments as well as
secretary-general of the Ministry of Culture and Tourism. Now in the private
sector, Hamzah is tirelessly engaged in international business ventures as well
as his family-owned private education interests.
There was no 1962 Analekta. Old Victorians and old
teachers in the arts stream of that year unfortunately cannot recall the
circumstances of this. It is a deliciously speculative thought, that had
there been a 1962 issue, two of today's well-known personalities would
certainly have contributed articles, or even edited the journal. One would
have been Datuk Rafidah Aziz, the Minister for Trade and Industry today
who launched her working career as an economics lecturer. A Rafidite
treatise on rural economics perhaps? Her classmate, Chuah Guat Eng, a
published writer whose first novel, Echoes of Silence, is a
prescribed text in the English departments of some Malaysian universities,
would almost certainly have contributed an article, a poem or even a short
story.
There were already hints of a malaise in the school's
extra-curricular scene by that time. The relentless annual surge in new
societies and clubs over the past five years had reached the limit of the
membership supply lines. There were some forty clubs/societies/uniformed
bodies vying for members to fill their thinning membership rolls. Victorians
were having less and less time for more and more clubs. This was, of course,
on top of the perennially heavy demands of the school curriculum and unceasing
Inter-House competitions. A 1963 Seladang editorial lamented the
ominous spate of interclass schisms, anti-arts or anti-science cliques, and
even a deep divide between Upper Six and Lower Sixth pupils. Rival groups, if
they turned up, reportedly sat apart from each other at society meetings.
In April 1964, under the aegis of the new Headmaster,
Mr V. Murugasu, the Senior Literary and Debating Society, the Geographical
Society, the Historical Society, the Economics Society held two long seminal
meetings. After much heated debate, they decided to merge into an new
all-encompassing entity, the V.I. Arts Union. All members of the Sixth Form
arts community would be automatic members while Form Five Arts students
and science students could become associate members. In one stroke there
were three fewer Societies in the school and, hopefully, reduced demands on
members' time. One consequence of this cosmic event was that the Analekta
now had a parent, becoming in the process the official organ of the Arts Union.
Its role vis-à-vis its parent mirrored that between the Scientific
Victorian and the Science and Maths Society. Like its science counterpart,
the Analekta would henceforth publish, together with its think pieces,
the annual report of its parent body as well as the various section reports of
the school exhibitions.
But all was not completely well. While the Analekta continued
publishing and the school's arts population dutifully supported it, the V.I.'s
main rival schools were giving it the cold shoulder. (Things were a little better
in the girls schools and in PJ schools though!) Its circulation had plummeted to
around 500 by 1965, which required a subsidy from the school to keep the journal
afloat.
To be fair, the Malaysia of the sixties was no longer
the Malaya of the late fifties. The values of Malaysian society were
changing, slowly but perceptibly. The pressures on the Malaysian schoolchild,
the V.I. pupil especially, were enormous. Under the Murugasu regime, there
was compulsory participation in extramural activities without any let up
in academic and sporting expectations. Errant pupils queued outside the
Headmaster's office to receive a stroke of the cane for each subject failed
in the trial exams. In 1963 the education department began a policy of
“localization”, taking in First Formers based on the proximity of their
homes to the school. The traditional feeder school arrangement was being
dismantled dragging down the quality of pupils joining the V.I. Reading
anything other than one’s textbooks became a dying habit, and writing -
good writing - a lost skill. Eventually something had to give and, in
the case of V.I. student publications, the dearth of contributors
and readers became a recurring annual headache. Even the Victorian,
the venerable school magazine with its guaranteed captive readership, needed
the Headmaster to coerce contributions with liberal strokes of his rotan.
What hope was there for the Analekta?
In 1967, a guest editorial by former teacher Mr John
Doraisamy, then a lecturer in education at the University, decried the
situation in many Malaysian schools, stating that "the whole aim of
pupils and teachers is to cram for the various public examination to the
utter neglect of personality development.” The time might come, he
feared, when thousands of pupils would leave school without being able to
write one sentence of correct English nor be able to grasp one passage of
an editorial. (Crucially, too, 1967 was the year when the Bahasa education
policy kicked in, with Standard One taught in Bahasa for the first time.
The inexorable decline of English was beginning.) Doraisamy concluded:
"It is my frank opinion that materialistic values which dominate Malaysian
society also dominate the daily lives of the teachers. In too many classrooms
in our country it is a case of ‘the hungry sheep look up and are not fed’."
Writing in the journal's Bowsprit and steering a
similar tack, the 1967 editor, Wan Ahmad Hulaimi, now a free-lance journalist
in London, noted bluntly that “a decade of creative writing has brought it
to a point of decadence – that writing for its own pleasure is, in this
institution, a dying art. Optimists have attributed this unproductivity to
literary dormance, pressure of work and sheer laziness; and that we are merely
experiencing a period of lull. While hoping that they are far from wrong, we
still think demise is a better word, for in the world of creative writing,
laziness and death are dangerously synonymous. The existing state of affairs
is a cause of concern as it is symptomatic of the future of publications of
this nature.”
Alas, his words were prophetic. Despite a fresh cover
design featuring a photograph of the school overlaid with the title The
Tenth Analekta, sales were tepid. A botched marketing campaign to
extend sales beyond Selangor brought that evil day ever closer. The
Analekta failed to appear in 1968; Mr Murugasu probably decided to
let the patient die to save the subsidy the school had been pumping in
The May 13 incident resulted in a blanket cancellation of just about every
major iconic school event in 1969 including the annual school sports and
the school play. The Analekta, if ever it was even considered for
resuscitation or resurrection, would have been low down in the list of
priorities.
For a while it lived on in spirit in the memories of
some V.I. pupils. There were some token attempts to revive it in the
early nineteen seventies when the Arts Union distributed gratis to its
members cyclostyled articles stapled together under the title “Analekta”.
The Union had hoped, perhaps vainly, that these would be of some use to
its members in the year-end HSC exams. By the mid-seventies - with the
entire secondary system virtually converted from English - the raison
d'être for such specialty publications had gone and the
Analekta disappeared quietly into the night.
Editors * * * * * |
| 1957 Hamzah bin Majeed
|
| 1958 A. Krishen Jit
|
| 1959 Zawiah binte Laidin
|
| 1960 Liu Tai Fung
|
| 1961 Paul Navaratnam
|
| 1962 * * Not Published * *
|
| 1963 Seto Kuan Mun
|
1964 Pamela Sodhy
Goon Kok Phoy
|
| 1965 Goon Kok Phoy
|
| 1966 Tee Lian Keong
|
1967 Wan Ahmad Hulaimi
|